Porter’s Five Forces for competitor analysis & advantage

Porter’s Five Forces – Competitor Analysis

Michael Porter’s Five Forces

Porter's five forces - Michael PorterMichael Porter’s five forces is a model used to explore the environment in which a product or company operates to generate competitive advantage.

Porter’s Five forces analysis looks at five key areas mainly the threat of entry, the power of buyers, the power of suppliers, the threat of substitutes, and competitive rivalry (advantage).

 

Michael Porter’s Five Forces:

New Entrants

Suppliers

Industry competitors and extent of rivalry & advantage

Buyers

Substitutes

Introduction to Porter’s five forces

The model of the Five Competitive Forces was developed by Michael E. Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors” in 1980. Since that time the ‘five forces tool‘ has become an important method for analysing an organizations industry structure in strategic processes.

Michael Porter’s five forces model is based on the insight that a corporate strategy should meet the opportunities and threats in the organizations external environment. Especially, competitive strategy should based on an understanding of industry structures and the way they change.
Porter has identified five competitive forces that shape every industry and every market. These forces determine the intensity of competition and hence the profitability and attractiveness of an industry. The objective of corporate strategy should be to modify these competitive forces in a way that improves the position of the organization. Porters model supports analysis of the driving forces in an industry. Based on the information derived from the Porter’s Five Forces Analysis, management can decide how to influence or to exploit particular characteristics of their industry.

To top

Overview of Porter’s Five Forces

The Porter’s Five Forces model is an “outside looking in” business unit strategy tool that is used to make an analysis of the attractiveness or value of an industry structure.

The Competitive Forces analysis is made by the identification of 5 fundamental competitive forces:

  • The entry of competitors (how easy or difficult is it for new entrants to start to compete, which barriers do exist)
  • The threat of substitutes (how easy can our product or service be substituted, especially cheaper)
  • The bargaining power of buyers (how strong is the position of buyers, can they work together to order large volumes)
  • The bargaining power of suppliers (how strong is the position of sellers, are there many or only few potential suppliers, is there a monopoly)
  • The rivalry among the existing players (is there a strong competition between the existing players, is one player very dominant or all all equal in strength/size)

Some academics believe that a sixth force could be included – government.

To top

The Original Porter’s Five Forces (Factors) for competitor advantage and competitive advantage:

Michael Porter’s Factor 1) Threat of New Entrants -

The easier it is for new companies to enter the industry, the more cut-throat competition there will be. Factors that can limit the threat of new entrants are known as barriers to entry. Some examples include:

  • Existing loyalty to major brands
  • Incentives for using a particular buyer (such as frequent shopper programs)
  • High fixed costs
  • Scarcity of resources
  • Government restrictions or legislation
  • Entry protection (patents, rights, etc.)
  • Economies of product differences
  • Brand equity
  • Switching costs or sunk costs
  • Capital requirements
  • Access to distribution
  • Absolute cost advantages
  • Learning curve advantages
  • Expected retaliation by incumbents

Michael Porter’s Factor 2) Power of Suppliers

This is how much pressure suppliers can place on a business. If one supplier has a large enough impact to affect a company’s margins and volumes, then they hold substantial power. Here are a few reasons that suppliers might have power:

  • There are very few suppliers of a particular product
  • There are no substitutes
  • The product is extremely important to the buyer, they cannot do without it
  • The supplying industry has a higher profitability than the buying industry
  • Supplier switching costs relative to firm switching costs
  • Degree of differentiation of inputs
  • Presence of substitute inputs
  • Supplier concentration to firm concentration ratio
  • Threat of forward integration by suppliers relative to the threat of backward integration by firms
  • Cost of inputs relative to selling price of the product

Michael Porter’s Factor 3) Power of Buyers/ Customers

This is how much pressure customers can place on a business. If one customer has a large enough impact to affect a company’s margins and volumes, then they hold substantial power. Here are a few reasons that customers might have power

  • Small number of buyers
  • Purchases of large volumes
  • Switching to another (competitive) product is simple
  • The product is not extremely important to the buyer, they can do without it for a period of time.
  • Customers are price sensitive
  • Buyer concentration to firm concentration ratio
  • Bargaining leverage
  • Buyer volume
  • Buyer switching costs relative to firm switching costs
  • Buyer information availability
  • Ability to backward integrate
  • Availability of existing substitute products
  • Buyer price sensitivity
  • Price of total purchase

Michael Porter’s Factor 4) Availability of Substitutes

What is the likelihood that someone will switch to a competitive product or service? If the cost of switching is low, then this poses to be a serious threat. Here are a few factors that can affect the threat of substitutes:

  • Buyer propensity to substitute
  • Relative price performance of substitutes
  • Buyer switching costs
  • Perceived level of product differentiation
  • Fad and fashion
  • Technology change and product innovation

The main issue is the similarity of substitutes. For example, if the price of coffee rises substantially, a coffee drinker is likely to switch over to a beverage like tea because the products are so similar.

  • If substitutes are similar, then it can be viewed in the same light as a new entrant.
  • Consider technology substitutes (who would have thought that MP3 technology would replace tape & CD’s?)

Michael Porter’s Factor 5) Competitive Rivalry

And last but not least, this describes the intensity of competition between existing firms in an industry. Highly competitive industries generally earn low returns because the cost of competition is high. A highly competitive market might result from:

  • Many players of about the same size, no dominant firm.
  • Little differentiation between competitors products and services.
  • A mature industry with very little growth.
  • Companies can only grow by stealing customers away from competitors.

For many industries, this is the major determinant of the competitiveness of the industry. Sometimes rivals compete aggressively and sometimes rivals compete in non-price dimensions such as innovation, marketing, etc.

  • Number of competitors
  • Rate of industry growth
  • Intermittent industry overcapacity
  • Exit barriers
  • Diversity of competitors
  • Informational complexity and asymmetry
  • Fixed cost allocation per value added
  • Level of advertising expense
To top of porter's five forces

Use of the Information from Michael Porter’s Five Forces Analysis:

Five Forces Analysis can provide valuable information for three aspects of corporate planning:

  • Statistical Analysis:
    The Porter’s Five Forces Analysis allows determining the attractiveness of an industry. It provides insights on profitability. Thus, it supports decisions about entry to or exit from and industry or a market segment. Moreover, the model can be used to compare the impact of competitive forces on the own organization with their impact on competitors. Competitors may have different options to react to changes in competitive forces from their different resources and competence’s. This may influence the structure of the whole industry.
  • Dynamical Analysis:
    In combination with a PESTLE Analysis, which reveals drivers for change in an industry, Porter’s Five Forces Analysis can reveal insights about the potential future attractiveness of the industry. Expected Political, Economical, Socio-demographical, Technological, Legal and Environmental changes can influence the five competitive forces and thus have impact on industry structures.
    Useful tools to determine potential changes of competitive forces are scenarios.
  • Analysis of Options:
    With the knowledge about intensity and power of competitive forces, organizations can develop options to influence them in a way that improves their own competitive position. The result could be a new strategic direction, e.g. a new positioning, differentiation for competitive products of strategic partnerships (see section 4).

Porter’s model of Five Competitive Forces (Porter’s five forces) allows a structured and systematic analysis of market structure and competitive situation. The model can be applied to particular companies, market segments, industries or regions. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the scope of the market to be analysed in a first step. Following, all relevant forces for this market are identified and analysed Hence, it is not necessary to analyzer all elements of all competitive forces with the same depth.

The Porter’s Five Forces Model is based on microeconomics. It takes into account supply and demand, complementary products and substitutes, the relationship between volume of production and cost of production, and market structures like monopoly, oligopoly or perfect competition.

To top

Influencing the Power of Porter’s Five Forces

After the analysis of current and potential future state of the five competitive forces, managers can search for options to influence these forces in their organization’s interest. Although industry-specific business models will limit options, the own strategy can change the impact of competitive forces on the organisation. The objective is to reduce the power of competitive forces.

The following figure provides some examples. They are of general nature. Hence, they have to be adjusted to each organization’s specific situation. The options of an organization are determined not only by the external market environment, but also by its own internal resources, competence’s and objectives.

Michael Porter’s Five Forces

Reducing the Bargaining Power of Suppliers
Partnering

Supply chain managementSupply chain training

Increase dependencyBuild knowledge of supplier costs and methods

Take over a supplier

Reducing the Treat of New Entrants
Increase minimum efficient scales of operationsCreate a marketing / brand image (loyalty as a barrier)Patents, protection of intellectual property

Alliances with linked products / servicesTie up with suppliersTie up with distributors

Retaliation tactics

Reducing the Competitive Rivalry between Existing Players
Avoid price competition – Differentiate your productBuy out competition

Reduce industry over-capacityFocus on different segmentsCommunicate with competitors

Reducing the Bargaining Power of Customers
Partnering Supply chain managementIncrease loyaltyIncrease incentives and value added

Move purchase decision away from priceCut put powerful intermediaries (go directly to customer)

Reducing the Threat of Substitutes
Legal actions – Increase switching costsAlliancesCustomer surveys to learn about their preferences

Enter substitute market and influence from withinAccentuate differences (real or perceived)

To top

Generic Strategies to help counter the Porter’s Five Forces

To counter the Porter’s five forces, Strategy can be formulated on three levels:

  • Corporate level
  • Business unit level
  • Functional or departmental level.

The business unit level is the primary context of industry rivalry. Michael Porter identified three generic strategies (cost leadership, differentiation, and focus) that can be implemented at the business unit level to create a competitive advantage. The proper generic strategy will position the firm to leverage its strengths and defend against the adverse effects of Porter’s five forces.

Assumptions made about the Porter’s Five Forces model:

  • That buyers, competitors, and suppliers are unrelated and do not interact and collude
  • That the source of value is structural advantage (creating barriers to entry)
  • That uncertainty is low, allowing participants in a market to plan for and respond to competitive behaviour.

Use of the Porter’s Five Forces model

The Porter’s Five Forces tool is a simple but powerful tool for understanding where power lies in a given business situation. This is important, as it helps you understand both the strength of your current competitive position, and the strength of a position you’re looking to move into.

With a clear understanding of where power lies, (using Porter’s five forces)you can take fair advantage of a situation of strength, improve a situation of weakness, and avoid taking wrong steps. This makes it an important part of your business planning toolkit.

Supplier Power
Supplier concentration
Importance of volume to supplier
Differentiation of inputs
Impact of inputs on cost or differentiation
Switching costs of firms in the industry
Presence of substitute inputs
Threat of forward integration
Cost relative to total purchases in industry
Barriers to Entry
Absolute cost advantages
Proprietary learning curve
Access to inputs
Government policy
Economies of scale
Capital requirements
Brand identity
Switching costs
Access to distribution
Expected retaliation
Proprietary products
Degree of Rivalry
Exit barriers
Industry concentration
Fixed costs/Value added
Industry growth
Intermittent overcapacity
Product differences
Switching costs
Brand identity
Diversity of rivals
Corporate stakes
Threat of Substitutes
Switching costs
Buyer inclination to
substitute
Price-performance
trade-off of substitutes
Buyer Power
Bargaining leverage
Buyer volume
Buyer information
Brand identity
Price sensitivity
Threat of backward integration
Product differentiation
Buyer concentration vs. industry
Substitutes available
Buyers’ incentives
To top 

 

Application with other tools

Porter’s five forces model works well in association with  a SWOT analysis and a PESTLE analysis

About Michael Porter

American Michael Porter was born in 1947. After initially graduating in engineering, Porter achieved an economics doctorate at Harvard, where he was subsequently awarded university professorship, a position he continues to fulfil at Harvard Business School. Porter’s research group is based at the Harvard Business School, and separately he co-founded with Mark Kramer the Foundation Strategy Group, ‘a mission-driven social enterprise, dedicated to advancing the practice of philanthropy and corporate social investment, through consulting to foundations and corporations’.

After his earlier work on corporate strategy Porter extended the application of his ideas and theories to international economies and the competitive positioning of nations, as featured in his later books. In fact in 1985 Porter was appointed to President Ronald Reagan’s Commission on Industrial Competitiveness, which marked the widening of his perspective to national economies. By the 1990′s Porter had established a reputation as a strategy guru on the international speaking circuit second only to Tom Peters, and was among the world’s highest earning academics.

Porter’s first book Competitive Strategy (1980), which he wrote in his thirties, became an international best seller, and is considered by many to be a seminal and definitive work on corporate strategy. The book, which has been published in nineteen languages and re-printed approaching sixty times, changed the way business leaders thought and remains a guide of choice for strategic managers the world over.

References:

This tool (Porter’s five forces) was created by Harvard Business School professor, Michael Porter, to analyze the attractiveness and likely-profitability of an industry. Since publication, it has become one of the most important business strategy tools. The classic article which introduces it is “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy” in Harvard Business Review 57, March – April 1979, pages 86-93

Michael Porter’s key books:

Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, 1980
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, 1985
Competition in Global Industries, 1986
The Competitive Advantage of Nations, 1990

Porter’ s Five Forces article – Key words:
5 forces, analysis, review, Porter, Harvard,  competitors, substitutes, buyers, suppliers, change, strategic, strategy, competitive, tool, framework, Michael Porter’s five forces

To top of porter’s five forces porter’s five forces

Reviewed June 2014


A SWOT analysis is a valuable diagnostic tool, but it is only as good as the data and context considered. Remember, keep the analysis real, in context and focussed on the goal you are seeking. 
When using a SWOT analysis, always use the PRIMO-F & PEST or PESTLE analysis profiles to ensure all factors are covered.

For more on SWOT analysis read our other articles. 


 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
About support

support team at rapidbi

Comments

  1. Michael Porter's Five Forces – Competitor Analysis – competitive advantage | RapidBI – Rapid Business Improvemen…

  2. Michael Porter's Five Forces for competitor analysis & competitive advantage http://t.co/oDTrbkAI via @rapidbi

  3. Worth using + easy to understand > Porter's 5 Forces for competitor analysis & competitive advantage http://t.co/eCYgj7CL via@247tweet

  4. Very Informative article. Thanks

  5. A great refresher…“@247tweet: Michael Porter's Five Forces for competitor analysis & competitive advantage http://t.co/9nO4FIOx”

  6. This article is very informative.but i want to know that how IT will impact on each of these five forces and also what are the implications for organization’s future strategies?

    • You cannot look at IT in isolation, for IT could make or break any internal changes.

      Often the problem with IT is that it is implemented in isolation
      the sooner organizations implement strategically and hiolistically according to the PRIMO-F framework the better – Note there is no IT in PRIMO-F – as IT is a part of resources!

  7. Very easy to understand.thanx

  8. New Blog post: Michael Porter’s Five Forces for competitor analysis & competitive advantage http://t.co/L3z2rPin

  9. New Blog post: Michael Porter’s Five Forces for competitor analysis & competitive advantage http://t.co/L3z2rPin

  10. New Blog post: Michael Porter’s Five Forces for competitor analysis & competitive advantage http://t.co/L3z2rPin

  11. RT@rapidbi Michael Porter’s Five Forces for competitor analysis & competitive advantage: Michael Porter's Five F… http://t.co/0GbaIBEb

  12. RT: @rapidbi Michael Porter’s Five Forces for competitor analysis & competitive advantage: Michael Porter's Five… http://t.co/3BfmbGUG

  13. Michael Porter's Five Forces for competitor analysis & competitive advantage http://t.co/0nEGyjKy

Trackbacks

  1. Blog post – Michael Porter's Five Forces – Competitor Analysis

  2. Always great (re) reading Porter. Inspires! RT @RapidBI: Michael Porter's Five Forces – Competitor Analysis

  3. Aman Sharma says:

    Very useful model “@RapidBI: Michael Porter's Five Forces – Competitor Analysis http://bit.ly/ig4ZZv”

  4. Deita Rolano says:

    RT @RapidBI: Blog post – Michael Porter's Five Forces – Competitor Analysis

  5. Muzaffer says:

    RT @RapidBI: Blog post – Michael Porter's Five Forces – Competitor Analysis

Speak Your Mind

css.php