Critical Success Factors – Analysis made easy, a step by step guide
Identify>> Determine>> Deploy>> Measure
What are Critical Success Factors? This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview and application of Critical Success Factors. use the links below to jump to the section of most interest.
What are Critical Success Factors (CSF’s)?
Being practical when using CSF’s
Types of Critical Success Factors
Five key sources of Critical Success Factors
How to write a good Critical Success factor
Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) and Critical Success Factors
The Critical Success Factor (CSF) Method
Using Critical Success Factors for Strategic and business planning
Sample Critical Success Factor templates
Critical Success Factors for Projects
Please note. some of the content on this page was formatted for a wider screen. we are working on reformatting this, but it will take some time – thank you for your understanding.
Critical Success Factors (CSF’s) are the critical factors or activities required for ensuring the success your business. The term was initially used in the world of data analysis, and business analysis.
Most smaller and more pragmatic businesses can still use CSF’s but we need to take a different, more practical approach.
Critical Success Factors have been used significantly to present or identify a few key factors that organizations should focus on to be successful.
As a definition, critical success factors refer to
“the limited number of areas in which satisfactory results will ensure successful competitive performance for the individual, department, or organization”.
As you read this and many other resources on the internet you will discover that there are potentially a confusing variety of definitions and uses of Critical Success Factors.
Before you start the journey looking at CSFs it is important to realise that the specific factors relevant for you will vary from business to business and industry to industry. The key to using CSFs effectively is to ensure that your definition of a factor of your organizations activity which is central to its future will always apply.
Therefore success in determining the CSFs for your organization is to determine what is central to its future and achievement of that future.
This page is primarily written for students of management and business, to keep things simple for application in smaller organizations remember to only have 5-7 critical factors for YOUR organization, and I am sure one of those will be cash flow!
Identifying CSF’s is important as it allows firms to focus their efforts on building their capabilities to meet the critical success factors, or even allow firms to decide if they have the capability to build the requirements necessary to meet Critical Success Factors (CSF’s).
The principle of identifying critical success factors as a basis for determining the information needs of managers was proposed by RH Daniel (1961 Harvard Business Review – HBR) as an interdisciplinary approach with a potential usefulness in the practice of evaluation within library and information units but popularized by F Rockart (1979 Harvard Business Review – HBR). Over time, many academics have applied the methodology increasingly outside the educational establishment.
The idea is very simple:
In any organization certain factors will be critical to the success of that organization, in the sense that, if objectives associated with the factors are not achieved, the organization will fail – perhaps catastrophically so.
The following as an example of generic CSF’s:
Factors that remain relevant today for many organizations.
With a phrase like Critical Success Factors having ‘common usage’ within technical environments it is difficult to identify its true history in the context of business, management and human resources. One test for originality is the use of the TLA (Three Letter Acronym) of CSF. And one of the earliest uses of this is by
Chief executives define their own data needs. By: Rockart, John F.. Harvard Business Review, Mar/Apr79, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p81-93, 13p
In this earlier work:
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CRISIS. By: Daniel, D. Ronald. Harvard Business Review, Sep/Oct61, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p111-121, 11p
Ronald does not use the term CSF or even the phrase Critical Success Factors, but does discuss critical elements and non-critical elements of a business leading to “controlling competitive success” Daniel also uses the term “success factors” in the context that we would understand today.
Predating these pieces is a short entry:
THE CASE STUDY METHOD AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARDS OF EFFICIENCY.By: Lebreton, Preston P.. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1957, p103-103, 1p
In which students looking into the efficiency of businesses for case studies are recommended to look at “the factors which seem to be paramount in determining success in this industry” this is bay far the earliest mention of what we today know as “Critical Success Factors”
To our mind, the first published work of this approach is by Rockart. This pages reproduced from RapidBI.com
Other sources of research:
Management Control Systems: Text, Cases and Readings By Robert Newton Anthony, John Dearden, Richard F. Vancil Published by R. D. Irwin, 1972 p151
This publication seems to be one of the earliest and widest cited books in the early days of CSFs.
10 problems that worry presidents. By: Spencer, Lyle M.. Harvard Business Review, Nov/Dec55, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p75-83, 9p
In this article Spencer asks the question: “What are the essential factors that produce success in my company?” which for 1955 is getting close to the beginnings of CSFs – so for those interested in the early beginings worth a look.
back to top of critical success factors
There are four basic types of Critical Success Factors CSF’s
They are:
Things that are measured get done more often than things that are not measured.
Each Critical Success Factors (CSF’s) should be measurable and associated with a target goal. You don’t need exact measures to manage. Primary measures that should be listed include critical success levels (such as the number of transactions per month) or, in cases where specific measurements are more difficult, general goals should be specified (such as moving up in an industry customer service survey).
back to top critical success factors
Critical Success Factor
an element of organizational activity which is central to its future success. Critical success factors may change over time, and may include items such as product quality, employee attitudes, manufacturing flexibility, and brand awareness. This can enable analysis.Critical Success Factor
any of the aspects of a business that are identified as vital for successful targets to be reached and maintained. Critical Success Factors are normally identified in such areas as production processes, employee and organization skills, functions, techniques, and technologies. The identification and strengthening of such factors may be similar. ..Critical Success Factor (CSF) or Critical Success Factors
Is a business term for an element which is necessary for an organization or project to achieve its mission. For example, a CSF for a successful Information Technology (IT) project is user involvement.
Using the term
The term “Critical Success Factor” is used differently, due to ambiguity of the word “critical”,
back and forth translations into other languages and interpretation when analyzed in portfolios:
Whichever definition you use. make sure that all managers understand the definition.
back to top critical success factors
MAIN ASPECTS OF Critical Success Factors and their use in analysis
Critical Success Factors are tailored to a firm’s or manager’s particular situation as different situations (e.g. industry, division, individual) lead to different critical success factors. Rockart and Bullen presented five key sources of Critical Success Factors:
Industry: There are some CSF’s common to all companies operating within the same industry. Different industries will have unique, industry-specific CSF’sAn industry’s set of characteristics define its own CSF’s Different industries will thus have different CSF’s, for example, research into the CSF’s for the Call centre, manufacturing, retail, business services, healthcare and education sectors showed each to be different after starting with a hypothesis of all sectors having their CSF’s as market orientation, learning orientation, entrepreneurial management style and organizational flexibility.In reality, each organization has its own unique goals so while thee may be some industry standard – not all firms in one industry will have identical CSF’s. Some trade associations offer bench-marking across possible common CSF’s.
Competitive position or strategy: The nature of position in the marketplace or the adopted strategy to gain market share gives rise to CSF’s Differing strategies and positions have different CSF’s
Not all firms in an industry will have the same CSF’s in a particular industry. A firm’s current position in the industry (where it is relative to other competitors in the industry and also the market leader), its strategy, and its resources and capabilities will define its CSF’s. The values of an organization, its target market etc will all impact the CSF’s that are appropriate for it at a given point in time.
Environmental changes: Economic, regulatory, political, and demographic changes create CSF’s for an organization.
These relate to environmental factors that are not in the control of the organization but which an organization must consider in developing CSF’s Examples for these are the industry regulation, political development and economic performance of a country, and population trends.An example of environmental factors affecting an organization could be a de-merger.
Temporal factors: These relate to short-term situations, often crises. These CSF’s may be important but are usually short-lived. Temporal factors are temporary or one-off CSF’s resulting from a specific event necessitating their inclusion.
Theoretically, these would include a firm which “lost executives as a result of a plane crash requiring a critical success factor of rebuilding the executive group”.
Practically, with the evolution and integration of markets globally, one could argue that temporal factors are not temporal anymore as they could exist regularly in organizations.
For example, a firm aggressively building its business internationally would have a need for a core group of executives in its new markets. Thus, it would have the CSF of “building the executive group in a specific market” and it could have this every year for different markets.
Managerial role: An individual role may generate CSF’s as performance in a specific manager’s area of responsibility may be deemed critical to the success of an organization.Managerial position. This is important if CSF’s are considered from an individual’s point of view.
For example, manufacturing managers who would typically have the following CSF’s: product quality, inventory control and cash control.In organizations with departments focused on customer relationships, a CSF for managers in these departments may be customer relationship management.
back to top critical success factors
In an attempt to write good Critical Success Factors (CSF’s), a number of principles could help to guide writers. These principles are:
Develop critical success factors that have a large impact on an organization’s performance – By definition, Critical Success Factors (CSF’s) are the “most critical” factors for organizations or individuals. However, due care should be exercised in identifying them due to the largely qualitative approach to identification, leaving many possible options for the factors and potentially results in discussions and debate. In order to truly have the impact as envisioned when critical success factors were developed, it is important to thus identify the actual critical success factors, i.e. the ones which would have the largest impact on an organization’s (or individual’s) performance.
Finding information for writing Critical Success Factors (CSF’s)
For the organization following the CSF method, the foundation for writing good CSF’s is a good understanding of the environment, the industry and the organization In order to do so, this requires the use of information that is readily available in the public domain. Externally, industry information can be sourced from industry associations, news articles, trade associations, prospectuses of competitors, and equity/analyst reports to name some sources. These would all be helpful in building knowledge of the environment, the industry and competitors. Internally, there should be enough sources available to management from which to build on their knowledge of the organization. In most cases, these won’t even have to be anything published as managers are expected to have a good understanding of their organization Together, the external and internal information already provides the basis from which discussion on CSF’s could begin.
The information mentioned above can largely be accessed through the internet. Other sources which would be helpful, and not necessarily accessible through the internet, are interviews with buyers and suppliers, industry experts and independent observers.
A “good” CSF begins with an action verb and clearly and concisely conveys what is important and should attended to. Verbs that characterize actions: attract, perform, expand, monitor, manage, deploy, etc. (“poor CSFs” start with: enhance, correct, up-grade, …)
Examples: “monitor customer needs and future trends”
After having developed a hierarchy of goals and their success factors, further analysis will lead to concrete requirements at the lowest level of detail
Some CSFs might influence other CSFs or factors such as markets, technologies, etc.
Such CSFs could be rephrased into “key influence factors” For example: “physical size” or “trained staff”
back to top critical success factors
A Critical Success Factor is not a Key Performance Indicator (KPI). Critical success factors are elements that are vital for a strategy to be successful. KPI’s are measures that quantify objectives and enable the measurement of strategic performance.
For example:
back to top of critical success factors
For other strategic business planning models please see our management models page
back to top of critical success factors
Statistical research into CSF’s on organizations has shown there to be seven key areas. These CSF’s are:
These were identified when Total Quality was at its peak, so as you can see have a bias towards quality matters. You may or may not feel that these are right or indeed critical for your organization.
The Critical Success Factors we have identified and use in the BIR process are captured in the mnemonic PRIMO-F
Following is a sample list of the more common success factors.
This list should serve only as a guide to get you started. Some of these factors will be irrelevant in a particular industry or competitive situation; others may need to be added, as appropriate.
The factors are grouped into three categories of organizational competency, you will use your own differentiators.
Examples of Success Factors:
Understanding of Market:
Marketing Variables:
Decision making:
back to top of critical success factors
Critical Success Factor analysis – Template 1
|
Critical Success Factors for __________________ Dated ____________
|
||
| Critical Success Factor | Source of CSF | Primary Measures & Targets |
| Industry, Strategy, Environmental, Temporal [delete as appropriate] | ||
| Industry, Strategy, Environmental, Temporal [delete as appropriate] | ||
| Industry, Strategy, Environmental, Temporal [delete as appropriate] | ||
| Industry, Strategy, Environmental, Temporal [delete as appropriate] | ||
| Industry, Strategy, Environmental, Temporal [delete as appropriate] | ||
back to top of critical success factorsp
|
Critical Success Factors for __________________ Dated ____________
|
||
| Success Criteria | Potential Benefit | Approach |
back to top of critical success factors
| What do you want to be?Vision / Mission / Strategic Goals / Critical Success Factors |
| Vision / Mission / Profile |
| What do we want to become / what is our purpose: |
| Mission: Vision: |
| Strategic Goals |
| What do we have to do to get there: |
| Strategic Goal #1: |
| Outcomes / Critical Success Factors |
| How we will get there: |
| 1.1 |
| 1.2 |
| 1.3 |
| 1.4 |
| Strategic Goal #2: |
| Outcomes / Critical Success Factors |
| How we will get there: |
| 2.1 |
| 2.2 |
| 2.3 |
| 2.4 |
| 2.5 |
| Strategic Goal #3: |
| Outcomes / Critical Success Factors |
| How we will get there: |
| 3.1 |
| 3.2 |
| 3.3 |
| 3.4 |
| 3.5 |
| Strategic Goal #4: |
| Outcomes / Critical Success Factors |
| How we will get there: |
| 4.1 |
| 4.2 |
| 4.3 |
back to top of critical success factors
What should you measure?
|
Measure Identification Worksheet This worksheet is helpful in creating the list of measures to support each Critical Success Factor |
||||||||
| Critical Success Factor | ||||||||
| Measures | ||||||||
| Supporting Measure Name | Definition / Formula | Is it a true indicator of this CSF? What is it telling you? |
Owner (who’s accountable?) |
Is Data Available? | If yes, Data Source? If no, is it possible to collect? |
Quality of Data? High / Low |
Targets Available? Yes / no |
Discard? Future? Keep? |
| Initiatives / Activities | ||||||||
| Supporting Initiative / Project | Unit / Person Responsible | Implementation Team Member Assigned | Target Start Date | Target Completion Date | Budget/ Resources | |||
back to top of critical success factors
Research has shown that to complete a project successfully the following critical success factors apply:
You can have all of the above elements, but if you lack an engaged and involved business sponsor, your chances for success are greatly lessened.
According to a Gartner Institute study, 50% of all projects were delivered above schedule and/or budget.
Many projects were delivered with significant functionality missing, often cancelled after requirements definition.
In 2001, the Gartner group updated their research to include lack of executive sponsorship as a major contributor to project failures.
According to a 2000 Standish Group Report, the top success factors for projects were as follows. The list is in decreasing order of percentage factors responsible for success.
% – Success Factors
back to top of critical success factors – CSF
Page Written April 2007 reviewed & updated March 2015 MDM
Who is responsible for marketing? If we Google or Bling "who is responsible for marketing"…
CSI in organizations – a valid approach? We are in the beginnings of massive change…
Social Networking Bill of Rights - the risk of sharing With more and more of…
Does your website/ intranet/collaboration tool engage? This for me is a highly thought provoking graphic.…
The State of the UK SEO & Social Media Sectors - who would you choose?…
What hope for UK business when #mentoring education fails The UK Department for Business, Innovation…