As many people know, the pharmaceutical industry (like many others) has over the last few years had to radically change some of their working practices and approaches. GSK was no exception.
Like many industries the culture and business climate that GSK is/ was operating within was changing. Customers and purchasers were changing their expectations.
For change to be effective, the team knew that it was not the launch of any change that was critical, but how to embed and ensure the initiatives around change actually “landed” fully in the business units.
To help drive the change, GSK identified three key levers:
All of these were to be supported through the development of resilience in the business, developing HR capability and identifying appropriate measures. Not just end point, but transitional ones.
To achieve the organisational goals it was recognised that the monolithic approach was no longer sustainable. The organization at all levels needs to become more agile. To help achieve this, a program with the aim of “building change capability” was developed. This was a fusion of Organizational Development OD, LEAN and Project management. The goal was to streamline the “lab to Industrial scale process.
Part of this process involved looking at the top 200. The managed to create near to 100% movement in the top 200 population. This was achieved through a blend of internal transitions and external appointments. Retention was an important driver. Development of this and other key groups was fundamental and the GSK leadership development framework, was one of the development tools to support the transition
This framework comprised: Managing self, Leading others, Leading managers, leading leaders to lead the enterprise.
This development program was said to be
Using the “keep it short & simple” approach measures initially in the transition were quantitative rather than qualitative. For example “Do you hole quarterly talent reviews?” and “Do you have ‘ready now’ successors?”. These and other simple dashboard indicators were used to measure “embedding” the process rather than more complex and time consuming measures.
As part of the change, HR teams also needed to be developed to accommodate many of the changes. Much of this was driven through a survey of 300+ senior leaders which provided a focus on three themes:
HR and senior leaders all gained a lot from the changes to these processes, some of the key learning points the organization is looking to embed further include:
This is one in a series of articles outlining some of the talks at this years #cipd annual conferenec for HR professionals in the UK and internationally.
How to lose up to 50 years of clients income Yesterday evening I had an…
ROI – Rapid Organizational Improvement It’s four in the afternoon on a Wednesday and you…
Trainers & Presenters mind your visuals As communicators, those of us that use visuals of…
It's not what is in front of you.. but what you see The amazing colour…
Organization Development (OD) is a complex strategy intended to change the beliefs, attitudes, values, culture…