Is Transactional Analysis (TA) relevant today?
In the first of a multi part series written by RapidBI team associate Vince Whittle, we look at Transactional Analysis and its application in management and people development.
Introduction to TA
Many people have heard of Transactional Analysis (TA) and it was popular a number of years ago in management development programmes but how relevant is a psychoanalytic tool developed in the ‘50s to today’s managers and consultants in industry and commerce?
There is scepticism about the role of a host of ‘psychological’ interventions and tools and the legitimacy of their use in the work place or of the consultant peddling their “snake oil” as a cure all for organisation problems – and rightly so. But what of a straight forward model for understanding the behaviour of our self and others that can give a rich insight into the complexities of human relations?
I would argue that knowledge and experience of Transactional Analysis as part of personal development provides a very useful understanding of individuals, relationships and communication which is at the heart of management and organisational effectiveness.
History of Transactional Analysis (TA)
TA has its roots firmly in the therapeutic arena. It was developed as an approach to psychotherapy by Dr Eric Berne, a Canadian Psychiatrist who had become increasingly frustrated with approaches to psychotherapy in the late 1950s. His revolutionary approach led to an effective theory of personality and systematic psychotherapy with a wide range of applications from clinical approaches to psychopathology, child development, communication and therapy for individuals, couples, groups and families. However the great legacy is its application outside the therapeutic field in education, social work, management and organisations.
The models that Dr Berne developed are readily accessible and provide insight into the dynamics of human relationships. He published Games People Play in 1964 which became a best seller. According to Dr. Berne:
“… games are ritualistic transactions or behaviour patterns between individuals that can indicate hidden feelings or emotions – you can think of a game as a series of interactions (words, body language, facial expressions, etc.) between two or more people that follow a predictable pattern. The interactions ultimately progress to an outcome in which one individual obtains a “payoff” or “goal.” In most cases, the participants of the games are unaware that they are “playing.””
All models are based on some key assumptions and in the case of TA the philosophical assumptions are that:
- People are OK – Both you and I have worth, value and dignity which is unconditional
- We all have the capacity to think – and be responsible to decide what we want and face up to the consequences
- We decide our destiny – strategies and ‘games’ we play even if decided on as children are our decisions and these decision can be changed
So how can some of the TA concepts help?
In TA, ego states are sets of related behaviours, thoughts and feelings. Individuals have a limited repertoire of these that can manifest themselves at different times. The repertoire can be can be sorted into three categories, ego states that resemble those of parental figures (referred to as Parent), those that are directed towards an objective appraisal of reality (referred to as Adult) and those which represent relics but which are still active and where fixated in early childhood. Movement between these states can explain some of the shifts in behaviour we observe in others and are all components of a person’s personality. It is important to remember that each of these states is quite distinct and that movement between them can be rapid. When two or more people interact we have what is called a “transaction” and that is when this understanding of structure becomes interesting,
Complimentary transactions are the basis of appropriate interchanges for example in Adult to Adult exchanges where there is some stimulus which is correctly interpreted and a complementary response is given. These complementary transactions lead to smooth communication, however when the transactions are crossed then communication breaks down. A classic example of this is where there is a stimulus that produces an inappropriate response, if the Adult to Adult stimulus was a question such as “Maybe we need to find out why you’ve been putting on weight recently?” the appropriate Adult to Adult response would be “Maybe we should I would really like to know” However if the person retorts angrily “ You are always criticising me just like my Dad, I hate you” you are getting a Child to Parent response and the Adult concerns about weight will be suspended until the transactions can be realigned.
The workplace has many such examples of “crossed wires”.
When people transact they acknowledge each other by an act of recognition – these are called strokes and are necessary for people to maintain both their physical and psychological wellbeing. Different strokes for different folks, is very true as many a naughty child will play up just to get the attention – even if it hurts! I bet you already recognise this in a number of your colleagues or clients! But understanding and recognising the need for strokes is fundamental in developing positive working relationships.
As children we write for ourselves a life script, it’s a story of our life with beginning, middle and end. The basic plot is formed in infancy and most of the rest is completed by age seven. Whilst most of us will not consciously remember what we determined for ourselves we are likely to live it out without being aware of it tending to set up our lives to move towards the final scene we decided upon when very small. Becoming aware of your own life script can help people understand how they may, unconsciously, set up problems for themselves – and how they may resolve them. Jerry B Harvey recognised this in his brilliantly titled book “How come every time I get stabbed in the back my fingerprints are on the knife?”
Games are ongoing series of complementary ulterior transactions which progress to well-defined and predictable outcomes. Dr Berne details thirty-five games in his book each of which results in a “payoff” for at least one of the players. Recognising what is happening in social interactions is sometimes difficult which is why TA therapists undergo extensive training. However having a knowledge and understanding of the nature of games gives managers and consultants some choices about how they approach engaging with others which can realise benefits for both.
TA – a summary
In summary the models developed by Eric Berne are readily accessible and straightforward, he uses simple language to describe some of the complexities of personality and social interaction and on the whole it is a very “user friendly” approach which clearly explains many of the truths we experience in our personal and work lives. That understanding gives choices in the way we manage our own communication and interaction helping us be more authentic and effective.
More to follow in coming pieces – how to use these concepts in practice
VJ Whittle 2010
Eniola Sarah NSINIMBUK says
22/05/2020 at 22:56I will like to download this article so I can go back to it from time to time.
Roberto Bértolo says
14/07/2012 at 05:04Transactional Analysis (TA) – is it relevant to todays world. #article http://t.co/i6SDKLxr
Charles Weinstein says
14/07/2012 at 03:13Excellent-"I'm OK/You're OK"lives:
“@247tweet: Transactional Analysis (TA) – is it relevant to todays world. #article http://t.co/DAsB64ie”
jara says
24/01/2010 at 08:51thanks for the new TA update. I’ve been basing my approaches on TA to manage my staff in my office and my children too.
Now I am developing some TA guides for nurses and caregivers in managing patients’ families and work colleagues in our hospital.
Will always be at your doorsteps. Will there be free prints for mailing for avid readers and students of TA like me?
Jara
rapidbi says
24/01/2010 at 11:00Hi, thanks for your comment on our Transactional Analysis (TA) article.
We have more coming soon.
You can duplicate any article on this site all we ask is that you keep a reference i.e. “© rapidbi.staging.wpengine.com used with permission” and if electronic a follow link back to this page.
Mike
Wally Bock says
08/01/2010 at 22:13RT @LeaderChat: Is Transactional Analysis (TA) relevant? Foundational concept for management and people development.?
Blanchard LeaderChat says
08/01/2010 at 22:05Is Transactional Analysis (TA) relevant? Foundational concept for management and people development.?
Ann Lewis says
08/01/2010 at 09:27RT @rapidbi: Blog article on Transactional Analysis (TA) an effective approach to management?
Unlimited Potential says
08/01/2010 at 09:05RT @rapidbi: Blog article on Transactional Analysis (TA) an effective approach to management?
Liz Sparkes says
08/01/2010 at 07:13As a trained Transactional Analyst, it’s great to see someone promoting this excellent tool for business use again. It was my model as a therapist for 15 years, and still underpins my work in sales and sales management. So, yes still highly relevant.
As for the length of the blog, for me it is a welcome relief to find something of substance to read, rather than sound bites which are so normal nowadays. TA is such a rich and multi faceted model for understanding human behaviour, an introduction this precise is a feet in itself! I look forward to reading more!
rapidbi says
08/01/2010 at 08:32Hi Liz
Thanks for your comments. you will see that most of our entries are this length. We have a number of articles on TA in the pipeline, others looking at application.
Mike
Paula Jones MCT says
08/01/2010 at 00:08RT @Rapidbi Transactional Analysis (TA) – is it relevant to todays world: Many people have hea..
Ann Hawkins says
07/01/2010 at 21:02Fist off, yes TA is just as relevant today – I use it all the time as do many of my colleagues and people to whom we introduce the concepts find them highly relevant.
Shame your blog post is so long that even for an afficionado it was a grind.
Last, frustrating that the comments aren’t comments that I can see and engage with but just RTs which aren’t comments at all.
rapidbi says
07/01/2010 at 23:37Ann, Thanks for your comments on our transactional analysis introduction – this is an introductory piece – more will be published in the coming weeks.
The piece is only 1100 words – we aim to have most of our articles between 800 & 1500 words – more than many blogs that keep entries to under 400 words and add little substance.
FYI you can see from the poll our audience is mostly managers not OD practitioners, so providing substance & depth is important to us.
Unfortunately I/ we cannot control who has and has not commented – this post only went up late in the day UK time so has not been read that many times yet – I am sure the comments will grow.
RTs are web “comments” they are called “trackbacks” and common on popular blogs.
I am sure if you pose a question or comment specifically about something in the piece readers will contribute their views too.
Mike
Gary Gorman says
07/01/2010 at 20:51RT@rapidbi Transactional Analysis (TA) – is it relevant to todays world: Many people have heard of Transactional A…
Neil Ryder says
07/01/2010 at 19:59New blog from friend Transactional Analysis (TA) – is it relevant to todays world I hope it is useful