Evaluating the impact of training – another failure

By RapidBI-orig - Last updated: Friday, November 7, 2008 - Save & Share - One Comment

On one forum I regularly visit was the question:

This is a common challenge

From the little information the individual have provided it does appear that there is strong anecdotal evidence that training is having a negative impact – this is helpful and a an effect on the success of the organisation.

If I were the L&D or Training manager I would be looking at the training we are doing, the customer satisfaction results and looking for correlation – unfortunately this impact is common but because it is negative people tend to dismiss it – it is information plain and simple.

Was it Einstein that said “the definition of insanity is doing the same things and expecting different results”?

The fact that the initial results have show that training is NOT helping, is a legitimate evaluation result – just not what many have been expected to obtain.

Evaluation in the marketing world requires a number of different attempts and to progress with the strategy which is the most successful – they trial – in many training interventions it is the first solution that is deployed. This is a side effect of training becoming a commodity – the reality is that training is and never will be a commodity – but for as long as it is treated this way organisations will not get the best of returns.

Solution
As an L&D or training function we need to look at what we can learn from other parts of the business world, and in the case of evaluation from the world of marketing. When rolling out a programme for a significant number of people that needs to have a substantial business impact we need to make sure we understand the needs and the audience, then we need to run a number of controlled pilots (not just one) and then to evaluate which method delivers the best business benefit – or indeed to go back to the drawing board.

This is a reason why L&D must be strategically aligned to the business and its objectives, otherwise we just will not have the time to research and develop effective solutions and run the ‘first solution’ off the starting blocks – and then wonder why as a function we are often not seen as strategic in many organisations – time to stop the catch-22 situation and educate our managers.
———————————————————————————-

Mike Morrison is director of RapidBI, an organizational effectiveness consultancy. He has been involved in HR, OD and strategic development for over 20 years. He can be contacted via www.rapidbi.com/

© This article is copyright RapidBI 2006, 2008 – it may be copied providing the authors are credited, and direct links maintained

© RapidBI.com 2008

http://www.rapidbi.com

This material may be put on your Blog or website – however please keep this copyright statement


© RapidBI.com This article has been written by Mike Morrison or one of the RapidBI team. We welcome your comments. If you wish to use any text you are free to do so, however please credit us and link to our site.
PLEASE RT – Help us by tweeting or adding this post to your favourite bookmark service. Feel free to add this page to your favorites (bookmark)

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Related posts:

  1. Why blog? Is it a Marketing tool?
  2. UK training sector crash?
  3. Top ten training tools or techniques
  4. Marketing and SEO for training providers
  5. What is happening in the world of L&D (Training)? Is it changing?

Posted in Marketing, Strategy • Tags: , , , , , Top Of Page

One Response to “Evaluating the impact of training – another failure”

Trackback from 247test (mike-247test)
Time February 1, 2010 at 03:27

Twitter Comment


Evaluating the impact of training – another failure [link to post]

Posted using Chat Catcher

Write a comment

You need to login to post comments!